https://harbingersdaily.com/if-conservatives-do-not-immediately-sever-ties-with-tucker-carlson-he-will-drag-the-party-down-with-him/
My best guess is that Tucker got spurned by a Jewish person or persons at one point in time and if you've ever had that happen ( and I have as well) -where you encounter a supremacy issue and that you suddenly realize they ( or this particular Jewish person) consider you an inferior to them; this can lead to venomous anti-Semitism even though in most cases most Jewish people are not that way. Nonetheless sometimes it's difficult to separate the supremacists in Judaism versus the nice ones.
But it's a good lesson for the Jewish community that if you mistreat the
non-jewish people , there is going to be blowback after a while.
"
He is still conservative in many ways, and this might be a big part of the problem. Many people still remember the Fox News journalist who delivered many powerful conservative monologues. I certainly do. Yet, anyone in their right mind must see that his views on Israel and the Jewish people have shifted dramatically. During his 2.5-hour podcast with Fuentes, Tucker said, "I always thought it's great to criticize and question our relationship with Israel because it's insane and it hurts us."
ChatGPT has an opinion about the matter as well :
"The wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy…" — James 3:17
"Based on everything we know about media behavior, political commentary, and Tucker's career pattern, here is the most likely explanation — without over-spiritualizing it and without assuming hidden personal trauma:
---
Yes — it is far more likely that Tucker's shift is strategic, not personal.
Let's break it down clearly and calmly:
1. Political commentators often shift positions to stand out
Tucker has made a career out of:
moving against the mainstream,
surprising audiences,
and creating controversy that generates attention.
He did this at CNN, then MSNBC, then Fox, then his own platform.
Controversy = virality = revenue.
That doesn't mean he "fakes" everything, but it does mean he is highly aware of what drives engagement.
---
2. Media economics reward provocation
The more shocking or contrarian his take, the more:
clips go viral
podcast appearances spike
donations/subscription revenue climbs
The incentives of the ecosystem he's now part of (independent platforms rather than Fox) push heavily toward extreme or contrarian content because that's what breaks through the noise.
---
3. There is zero public evidence of him having a personal "spurning" incident
Nothing in:
biographies
staff leaks
public interviews
past behavior patterns
suggests that he had a personal negative experience with a Jewish individual that changed his worldview.
This theory isn't impossible, but it lacks any support.
---
4. What does match his current behavior?
His pattern is:
Identify the place where "the right" seems most unified.
Move two steps outside of that consensus.
Frame that break as "brave truth-telling."
Partner with extreme figures to amplify that break.
This is exactly what happened with:
Ukraine
January 6
Big Tech
CIA
Big Pharma
Israel (now)
It's the same blueprint every time.
---
5. Radically anti-establishment positions attract younger male audiences
Those audiences bring:
massive engagement
shareability
subscription revenue
And figures like Nick Fuentes already have a built-in audience that Tucker is tapping into by appearing with him.
This is not accidental.
It's strategic expansion.
---
Conclusion
The simplest, most evidence-based explanation is:
Tucker's pivot is primarily driven by strategy, virality, and revenue — not by a personal wound or a private grudge.
People rarely build a media empire around their personal grudges.
But they often build one around controversy.
And Tucker is very, very good at creating controversy that pays."
---